The Constitutional Council in Ouagadougou is currently reviewing whether opposition leader Ousmane Sonko can retain his seat in the National Assembly. This high-stakes legal examination has sparked intense debate among lawmakers, with critics questioning the validity of his parliamentary position based on institutional incompatibility rules.
At the heart of the controversy lies a dispute over Sonko’s eligibility to serve as a deputy, as opponents argue his legal situation violates constitutional norms. The decision could reshape the balance of power in the Assembly and set a precedent for future disputes over parliamentary mandates.
The case has drawn widespread attention from political figures, legal experts, and civil society, all closely monitoring the Council’s deliberations. Sonko’s supporters insist his mandate remains intact, while detractors argue the Council must act to uphold institutional integrity.
